=====
From vansickl@erols.com:
I think this one stretched the concept a little too far.


=====
From bbowen@cswnet.com:
I really like your zoom/perspective technique. It adds a lot to the overall exposition of the illusionary technique, as well as looking kinda cool. :)

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
Interesting trick :)  I like the way the water looks.

=====
From AzChip@aol.com:
The idea was outstanding.  I've seen those Escher prints and thought about seeing the subjects from other angles; you've shown us how it works.  Very well done.  I'd suggest smoother camera movements for improvement.  Also, I felt the background color didn't really work with the forground.  The modelling was excellent (aside from the relatively detail-less background), and the thought that went into this image was amazing.

=====
From bitdaf@tcainternet.com:
I think a lot of the credit for the theme go to Mr. Escher here- the camera animation was adequate but uninspired... Not bad but would have like to see an original twist somewhere.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Yeah man !
I liked this one.
I can't find anything to criticise ;-)
The only noticeable imperfection I found was one of my windows viewer (Media
Player 6.01.05.0217) some annoying replication of the last column of pixel in
multiple columns.
The pity is that my other viewer (mpeg2play win32, 1.1b) does dithering rather
than true colours :-(

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
It's Escher come to life.  A fascinating look at the inner workings of something which cannot exist.  Very well done.  Yup, I couldn't watch it just once.  What's the severe artifact along the right edge of the screen?

=====
From lou_bruce@yahoo.com:
Very clever. 


=====
From file:
Wow, it's amazing the way you re-constructed the original paint. Congratulations
Notable for originality, composition, modelling


=====
From file:
Notable for originality, composition, modelling