=====
From cmorack@relex.com:

Think I saw this on about 9000 movie box covers in the 1980's.
=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice point of view!

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
Very nice composition. Good mood. Technical merit goes down, though, since most
of
the scene was made with ready-made models and include files. 

=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
   Sorry, but most of the image is the street, and the rest is not really
eye grabbing.

=====
From rbjorn@algonet.se:

Can_t give you any technical scores, you didn_t do anything yourself...
=====
From kefriber@online.no:
Stunning,,,the 'thing' that draw my rating for this picture down is that the 
'main' features (the man & bike) was 'shortcut-made' - but all in all a fab. pic
!!

=====
From dormammu@erols.com:
Most the work seems to be done with INC files, which deducts from your score
slightly.  Other than that, it's a nice picture.

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
Very good for the theme.  This picture stands out.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Dramatic!

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good use of other people's stuff, but how much is your own?
What's the reason for the downward camera angle?  The bottom half
of the image is featureless...

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Nicely done, and an interesting camera angle.
However, it is a downloaded bike and a downloaded
city.... not much original technique.
The texturing is decently done, and the flare a nice
touch.


=====
From no13@ozemail.com.au:
A little too much of the foreground (raod) showing. Seams to make the
image a little unbalanced. Other than that excellent.

=====
From econoltd@thezone.net:
Good choice for the camera angle, but the unfinished look of the face contrasts
sharply with the rest of the detail.  Possible add more shadow around the face
area?


=====
From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net:
Nice scene.  Background is good.  City.inc looks promising.  Street is too
empty.  This comment by clem@dhol.com.