=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
?? Moon can be done with photo of moon wrapped around
a sphere as an image map???  Was there a reason for
your technique?
=====
From agage@mines.edu:
Nicely done, though there are a lot of moon-over-water images this round...

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
I like the title! Lighting is good, too.

=====
From dormammu@erols.com:
A nice image.. but why are there stars in the water and on the mountains?

It also seems a little plain.  Maybe a boat on the water or some such?

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
A nice peaceful image, well composed.
On our monitors the moon looks more like the Death Star. Maybe something was
lost in the conversion to JPEG.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
The ground is excellently done!  The sky needs some
more work, though... the moon doesn't look like the
moon, and the reflection of the stars in the water
is too specular (you need to use better antialiasing,
I suspect).


=====
From econoltd@thezone.net:
I actually know of a place that looks like this at times...nicely done.


=====
From r@207.232.193.166:
Moon needs to be larger and brighter.
Notable for textures, composition


=====
From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net:
The sky and shore are very good.  The little trick with the horizon is clever. 
The water texture is good, but the specular star reflections are unnatural and
detract.  The moon is the weak spot It looks more like a technological
artifact.  Perhaps the ruins of the Death Star.  Or Asimov's semiartificial
planet Trantor.  This comment by clem@dhol.com.