=====
From cyber.mage@mailexcite.com:
Nice figures, but sick idea!

=====
From agage@mines.edu:
I knew there would be at least one of these this round...

A bit tasteless, I have to say, at least for a public competition.


=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Scored you low on concept.  Perhaps full view of genatalia would have been tolerated had your work had a more clear message of some sort about sexual practice.  But the vagueness and silly pun make it seem merely pornographic. 
=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
I'm not offended! Thanks for a bit of fun! Don't take seriously other posibly bad comments...

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
Jag gillar iden, och modellerna ar ganska valgjorda, men Profilpaketet ser valdigt
stort ut...

=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
   You seriously submitted this? I admire your courage. You got all 1's from
me, but I admire your courage.

=====
From sanna@censa3.polito.it:
An "interesting" interpretation of theme
=====
From kefriber@online.no:
We scandinavians DO rock - right ? *lol* 
(Men den der profil-pakken så 'litt' stor ut - eller ?) ;-)
As you can see from my vote you've scored MAX on the originality,
but I've moderated my voting on the artistic/technical due
to the simplicity of the surroundings, and the sheet looks kinda weird...
You got me laughing though,,,,cewl - keep on rockin !

=====
From dormammu@erols.com:
The humans look waaaay too stiff and unreal.  More background would've been 
better.  (ie, night stand, table, lamp, whatever.)
=====
From karl@pemail.net:
Looks like the revenge of the blow-up dolls.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Words fail us!

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Certain areas of the image seem strangely blurry -- why?
No shadows.  Looks like a scanline, not raytraced.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Uhhhh....

The guy looks like an inflatable dummy.
The sheets could use some work..
The female is nicely modelled.
The concept is a matter of taste -- it is on topic,
  but there's nothing really special about it.

The "AIDS" message seems like a weak attempt
to avoid offending people.



=====
From cfusner@enter.net:
Must have been quite a night. From the positioning and facial expression
it looks like she killed him.


=====
From r@client876c.globalnet.co.uk:
Sadly not even erotic.


=====
From r@207.232.193.166:
You perv.  This contest should never have even allowed this entrant.  (Kinda interesting, though)
Notable for modelling, lighting


=====
From r@du206-1.ppp.algonet.se:
Message from author:


=====
From r@du206-1.ppp.algonet.se:
Message from author:       I must say I canīt really understand the fuzz about this picture... You donīt see any intime body-parts! And I thought that we all are so familiar with AIDS that we could joke about it... Jesus, theyīre even using condoms! (Look at the condoms package beside them...) This could by all means be a picture for an Anti-Aids-campaign!!! I know that I will get deducts for this, and perhaps my other picture will suffer as well, but I donīt care!!! This is a competition mainly for POV-users, and this has become very clear for me... 


=====
From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net:
A nice model with a lame background is a mistake.  When you establish a certain level of detail in one part of the pic, you need to maintain it.  Making the man hairless was a bit of a copout.  Marginal for topic.  Your human proportions are better here than in your other image.  The shoulders don't connect quite right.  Your modelling shows promise.  If you learn to think a bit more about composition and a bit less about sexual frustration, you have considerable potential.  This comment by clem@dhol.com.