=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
Yoiks... everything is soooo flashy... what part did you really want people to
see???

=====
From agage@mines.edu:
I'd suggest leaving the antialiasing on for final images -- even if it has to
run overnight (or all week, in some cases) the difference in quality is
noticed.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
I'm a Trekkie, but this image doesn't inspire me, especially as to theme of "night."
=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
The background looks stunning, but the water as you say looks a bit strange. 
How about using a highly turbulent crackle normal?
Good scene, though!

=====
From sanna@censa3.polito.it:
Maybe is not too original but the sky with starts is execellent

=====
From dormammu@erols.com:
All those sparkles would make me go blind in real life, I think :>

=====
From karl@pemail.net:
Interesting picture - shame about the star trek model

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Dazzling use of Galaxy.INC.
Personally we think it would have looked better if the Enterprise had been somewhere near horizontal.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
A very bright image, even though it is clearly at "night".
Lots of oily, colorful textures throughout.
I don't know about the Enterprise.  Would this be a better
scene without it?  Or at least should it be at a normal angle?

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Thanks for the tip on the galaxy file!

The image is interesting, and a wonderful first
effort.  The placement of the Enterprise,
though, is a bit strange... it is within
two ship-lengths of the ground!

The texturing is quite interesting.


=====
From econoltd@thezone.net:
A bit heavy on the heavenly bodies...almost makes you want to squint.  Maybe if the activity in the sky was toned down a bit...


=====
From r@207.232.193.166:
Space, the final frontier...
Notable for textures, modelling, lighting


=====
From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net:
Off topic smuggled sci fi.  Not enough original material.  Sky way too busy.  Uses copyrighted material.  This comment by clem@dhol.com.