=====
From spanky@wpi.edu:

The mountains, sky, and lake in this scene are very nice.  It seems to lose a
little bit of it's cohesiveness and aesthetic qualities in the rocks and green 
ground surrounding the lake.  This scene should be worked on more, it has some 
great potential.
=====
From rotht@televar.com:
The mountain could use a few more shades of color.  Other than that, though, it
is a truly beautiful scene.





=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
The mountains are almost tri-tone, and like it. I think that I prefer this
effect to the "obviously polygonated" effect one usually gets from rendered
landscapes.
=====
From d97ta@efd.lth.se:
the three colored mountain could use a few more shades of blue.
adjust lighting to suit my taste :)

=====
From buck@cs.byu.edu:
Nice tree, and the water looks good.  The mountains look pretty
"discretized"--I can see maybe three or four separate colors.  More
variation would help the realism alot.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
This is a nice use of Bryce, but POV-Ray (especially TMPOV) does
a better job on this sort of scene.

The mountain needs a richer texture to reveal the roughness
of the rocks. 


=====
From fisher2@pobox.upenn.edu:
Everyithing in the scene looks pretty real except the mountain in the
background which has a strange flat texture too it which makes the mountain
look kind of cartoony.  If the texture had some shading to it.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
"mntlake"?  You might want to get more creative on your titles, Mike.
I like the bluish textures on the mountains.  The mirrorlike surface of the
water is scenic, but doesn't seem realistic:  shouldn't we be able to see
(slightly) below the waterline?  Good variety on the surfaces used throughout
the scene.


=====
From r@199.45.245.103:
Nice. Something's a bit off about the mountain, but otherwise very nice.