=====
From spanky@wpi.edu:

Now, despite the fact that this is similar to your other entries, this actually
kicks some ass! :)  Nice coloring and textures.
=====
From mikko.oksalahti@dosetek.varian.com:
Very harmonic colors and shapes. For some reason I love these kind of images. 
I would have given more points if only the image would've represented the topic
better and the composition would have been better. Now there's a little "off"
feeling about it, with too much empty space on the bottom for my liking.
=====
From scooby@pld.com:
Beautiful image.  Highly artistic.  Has very little to do with theme, other than stumbling across an organic-looking form.

=====
From marc_w@ncx.com:

really pretty background
=====
From ewgr@abaddon.globalnet.co.uk:
Certainly repulsed me in a negative sense... [Just kidding] Actually quite neat.

=====
From buck@cs.byu.edu:
Nice picture, but I have to ask:  what is it?

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
This is a stunning image!!!

Unfortunately, I think the "nature" connection isn't there.   If it
was made by the GOOs, it isn't really natural, is it?


=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
Why isn't the image centered?  It's beautiful and appealing, but it
doesn't conjure the idea of "nature" for me.

=====
From uwe.post@gmx.de:
Savage.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Colourful and artistic. Connection to subject is tenuous.

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
Graphically very nice, BUT what about some topic ?
You win the 1st place for the "I put eyeballs everywhere regardless of the
topic" competition...
Why did you submitted a handful of less interesting images ?
You could have used the bioform thing to create wonderful, even imaginary,
plants or animals.
Why did you restrained yourself with looks-like-nothing stuff ?

=====
From fisher2@pobox.upenn.edu:
This is probably the one I like the most of the bioform images.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Eagle talons and wicker baskets...

=====
From no13@ozemail.com.au:
I don't think this rounds topic realy suited the style of image. However
I still liked it a lot. If we ever have a SURREAL topic and you do
something like this you should do realy well.


=====
From r@fermi.lancs.ac.uk:
Excellent modelling and textures, but hardly nature more like fantasy.


=====
From r@199.45.245.103:
This is, IMHO, the best of your submissions. The whatever-it-is is very well-textured, and I am very impressed with the background texture and the halo effects. I do think its a bit of a stretch to the "nature" theme.
Notable for textures, modelling