=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Nice job on the porthole--but it sets off the lesser-quality wooden texture on
the wall. I think the wall texture is where you could increase the quality of
the image most. That item on the lower right is not up to the quality of the
rest of the image either (well, I don't think it is, but I can't tell what it
is). Really nice detail out the window! Your dirty ship, sea shells, and plant
life are great!
=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
Neat idea, although I think a few differences between the toy and real ships
would
have made it more interesting.  perhaps some color changes or seaweed on the
real ship.

=====
From vogelap@email.uc.edu:
Excellent, creative interpretation. A little sterile, but nice.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I'm not sure why you added a second sphere for the lamps. Besides, the lamp
visible on the laft side does not seem to be a light soiurce at all, otherwise
its shadow would not be that strongly visible.
A nice idea to have similar scenes outside and in the aquarium.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Strange idea, to have an aquarium undersea! But perhaps not more than to have
a bird in a cage. :) About the scen, tis nice, well modelled, with a nice
"nautilus" look.

=====
From Varyk@aol.com:
nice modelling!  the reflections in the brass make it worth it.

=====
From djohnston@iname.com:
I love the irony of the sunken ship and the ship in the aquarium...a nice
touch.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Cool concept.
I really like the sand and bubbles in the aquarium.


=====
From r@138.102.96.24:
Notable for originality


=====
From r@tk156239.telekabel.at:
Another winseat?