=====
From caleb@chemeng.uct.ac.za:
check out anti-aliasing - will do wonders for this picture

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
It seems like you put a lot of effort into it, but the image is incomprehensible
to me.  Sorry.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
There's a lot of good things going on in this image... 
however, there
is also major room for improvement.

* It needs antialiasing
* It is too dark
* Much of the scene (like the green material) is 
confusingly textured

This has enormous potential.  It really is a striking 
scene, and Nar
is exceptionally well represented.  It just needs a little 
more attention
to the details.

=====
From east103@dialaccess.com:
Nice job with the wings.

=====
From rohde@xmailer.informatik.uni-bonn.de:
The idea for this picture is great; If I were the person in charge, this would
certainly be my "honorable mention"! I would love to sea the inverse version
from the real worlds' point of view.
=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
This is a hard one to comment on. The idea is very 
original but the image is a bit hard to interpret.

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
The two way image is a clever idea and, except for the 
very unrealistic fire, the modelling and textures are very 
good.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very strange story. So the pic is also strange, not very "ovbious", but
interesting when you see it during a while, after reading your writting.


=====
From r@www-cache-atm.informatik.uni-bonn.de:
In an earlier comment, I wrote that I would give your picture a honorable
mention for the idea. What I meant to say that this would be the least I would
give it. Some other pictures (for example the frog/apple, which redefines
"photorealistic") had a nicer look in terms of clarity and colors, but yours
has been my #1 vote because of the great idea.
Notable for originality, composition