=====
From denny1@home.com:
NT haiku (found on net somewhere):
As I consider my great fault
Through the darkening blue window,
I begin again.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Again War. But at least it is directed against those who just cherish it, so in
fact one can have a double reading of this one. And the recursion from
imaginary to reality is a recurring theme I particularly like.
The only think I found artistic is the placement of the projection room, it
really looks dynamic there, that is also the only explanation for my technical
mark.
Lasers are just too plain. The screen could have done with a bit more work.

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Loved the concept.  Very informative text file, and the footnote made me laugh
out loud.  The explosion on the ride platform looks great.  Good shadows.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very good story, as usual. Nice composition and lighting. And the best is that
you have your own style, which I can recognize even without reading your name
on the txt (I like to see the images first, without knowing the author).

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
A striking image but without the text it is difficult to tell 
what is going on. Is the image a stand-alone image or an 
illustration for a story in the text ? The signs here , the 
date/time and the room on hydraulic supports tell part 
but not all the story . A good image nevertheless .

=====
From gshaw@monotix.co.za:
I foresee another wave of Y2K panic after this <grin> (Yes I've also done
Y2K stuff)
Well modelled. How come Virtual energy weapons do real damage? (No I've
never seen West World)
The energy beams look very good.
Looking at your comparison of render times I see that it is time to dump the
aging P150/64 W95

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Neat concept, and well executed with plenty of action and humour. A busy image,
but looking closely you can see a few simple flat surfaces which would benefit
from
some texture. The beams of death would be improved with some media. Love the
Post-It(tm) notes.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
you do not need a renderer for this scene. 


=====
From r@209.155.62.50:
Notable for originality


=====
From r@209.155.62.50:
good interpretation of topic