=====
From sammy@cube.net:
Great looking, but would have fitted a lot better in the 'water' round.
=====
From spanky@wpi.edu:
You did a stellar job with what is in this scene.  It is really way to sparse
however.  Also, I see landscapes like this in nature, so it kinda misses
the whole "Imaginary World" theme.  I really can't find anything else wrong 
with this scene, it's nigh on photorealistic :)

=====
From denny1@home.com:
Erm, topicality? If it is an imaginary world, it sure looks a lot like
pastoral earth.

The river appears to have some pretty high swells, given the channels it has
cut out of the rock.

=====
From mztyree@sedona.net:
Excellent texture and color!

=====
From Nathan@Kopp.com:
impressive!!!  a great technical feat!  but how does it really fit the concept?
oh, well... I really wish I could make landscape this good.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Where did the theme go ? No comments about it ?
I have to admit I liked the texture and the water. But that is not my idea of
the theme at all.

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Really impressive textures.

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
A very nice peaceful scene.  I don't see much 
connection with the topic, unless you feel such a serene 
place can only exist in our imagination.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Good image.

=====
From gshaw@monotix.co.za:
In what way is this imaginary?  Very nice though.

=====
From kniazfam@ohio.net:
This image is so real... so subtle...  beautifully done!

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
This is a beautiful image. I think I've been here... The water is very
impressive.
Not much to the composition though, and not a very original approach to the
theme.

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
It looks very nice, but I don't understand how it fits the topic.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
Nice learning exercise. 


=====
From r@209.155.62.50:
Very pretty, but I think I missed the point.


=====
From r@209.155.62.50:
Notable for textures, lighting, modelling