=====
From chris@bluelectrode.com:
Exploding fountain and outer-space background aside, and excellant image. 
Everything looks modeled extremely well.

Good job.

=====
From clintona@ibm.net:
The image is very convincing - models are well made and placement is good. 
Where is the light coming from though?
=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
crisp and appealing

=====
From YaelParis@operamail.com:
Quite common composition though well-made.

nb:Penses a faire ta description en anglais, tout le monde ne parle pas
francais!


=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Most important thing about this great image is that it has a consistent style of
construction. 
=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
looks good but looks fake somehow

=====
From tom@tomandlu.force9.co.uk:
Very nice - more obvious light sources would have got it a higher score.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
English, please !
Very nice looking scene. A good sense of scene composition and the idea of a
garden that feels like it's inside the home.
A bit greek or roman ?
A nice viewpoint.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Well modelled. Composition is also good. But I don't understand lighting, 
specially the placement just above the scene, and a bit excesive.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Technical - tres bon! Very good!
Artistic - tres bon! Very good!
Theme - more a court yard, mais une jardin (sort of...) partial marks!

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
This is a very nice image. Good attention to detail and some nice modeling. I'm
not sure why the starfield is there in the upper left corner, though. And there
seems to be a main light source in the middle of the fountain, which seems
rather
strange. Some more careful lighting and removing that odd starfield would make
this better, I think.