=====
From :
Tick, tick, tick.... I'd be longer on parametric robes and Maketree foliage than
fog.

=====
From batronyx@cadronhsa.com:
I think some of the media is a bit overdone, but it does effectively hide the
lack of detail as you hoped.

=====
From tony@awmcs.net:
I'd have never noticed that you used streached spheres for the people if you
didn't tell me. Though the image is somewhat primitive I think it does well
with the overall composition of the image.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
A nice moody look here.  Good use of media and light.  
To be honest, I didn't realize the people were people 
until I read the text file... they looked like some sort of 
odd fence or barrier to me at first.  The line between the 
lighted and dark sides of the moon seems rather sharp.  
The tree looks good, though, and with a little additional 
work this scene would have worked a lot better for me.

=====
From jsimpson@acm.org:
heavy media distracts from the scene

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
The clouds in the sky seem to be continued in front of the foreground
which somehow blurs the picture.  Composition looks nice, i like the
abstract people too.

=====
From youknow@ucan.foad.org:
It took me quite some time of looking at this to realize that
the people really were people, even with the text file
explanation. Some of that is no doubt a result of the fog and
the darkness of the scene. Some is the scale of the people
to the very huge crosses.

I think with that much fog the stars would not be so visible.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic: A nice scene but somehow the stars look like they are in the
foreground instead of the background, perhaps it has something to do with the
fact that they show up brightly against the fog....
Concept: Fits the topic fairly well.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Epistemology:
(See ontology.)

Axiology:
What is it to worship on one's own?  What do each of these nameless (shapeless)
objects think of as they worship?  And why?

Ontology:
As I asked of Disney's 'Fantasia', what is the point?  We went through humanism
in the 16th century, and no longer need to be part of a nameless, collective
worship, since we have discovered that we can make distinctions without
justifying it to a concept of god (the Copernican revolution).  We no longer
have to be pawns in some religious chess match, just as 'human' is not the
center of the universe.