=====
From BigTrav2001@chartermi.net:
Although the image itself is well done, I'm afraid the most impressive thing
here is the .txt description. Which I did find rather impressive and
interesting.
=====
From pixel_guy@hotmail.com:
interesting image, but a bit too simple for my taste

=====
From marlo.steed@home.com:
A nice looking image.  However, not enough 3D look for my liking...at least for
this competition.  
=====
From marcelocarvajal@ieee.org:
It looks like an old video game. I don't think it looks like a ray tracing. The
bugs are too small, but I give you a higher score for artistic merit, because
it looks kind of nice.



=====
From jhiggins@mooseworld.net:
I don't think I get this.

=====
From lrwii@janics.com:
I don't understand your scene. I've read and reread the 
TXT file. And the only I can say is that I disagree with 
something you said. 
 
   there is no base set of rules that
everyone follows (or should follow) when creating or 
viewing an image.  Rather,
each image must establish and hold to its own criteria.

I belive that there is a base set of rules. Every media an 
artist chooses to use can only do certain things. With a 
pencil and paper an artist can create the Illusion of 
space. But cann't create a photo.  And have you ever 
try to view a picture in complete darkness or with you 
eyes shut.   

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
If you use the "hollow" keyword in the plane, the media can go on either side.