=====
From BigTrav2001@chartermi.net:
No explanation of anything whatsoever? Hmmm... this is really one of those
pictures where an explination would be helpful. Also, it would be nice if you
had rendered this a little (lot) bigger.
=====
From pixel_guy@hotmail.com:
a larger render would be nice - more detail to critique

=====
From marlo.steed@home.com:

Hard to tell what this is all about... perhaps a slightly different angle would
have provided a better perspective.
=====
From jhiggins@mooseworld.net:
Perhaps you could tell us what renderer you used and a bit about how you created
this image next time.

=====
From lrwii@janics.com:
I'd focus on the fly. And try a larger size.

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Crop the image to only the important parts.  The sky may be nice, but it is a
distraction, rather than a clarificaiton of the theme.   

But. . . I do not understand why it is significant for me to see this bug.

This is a generic note about realism:
Realism is nice, but why is realism significant artistically?  Is there any
other way(s) to represent more accurately, or more beautifully, which are not
realistic methods?


=====
From file:
Some more information in the description would be nice, as would a larger
image.