=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
While I like the image it seems to be seriously off-topic. Nowhere in any of my
research have I found crablegs listed under architecture.

=====
From klynn@telefish.net:
The connection to the topic (Architecture) is not clear.

=====
From maarten_hofman@hotmail.com:
Topic isn't Architecture, difficult to rate.
=====
From raytracing@grayproductions.net:
While techinically impressive, I have a hard time seeing this image as on
topic.
=====
From tek@evilsuperbrain.com:
Um... we do have a topic here: it is "architecture", this is not.


=====
From xilo_m@hotpop.com:

You're on the right track to make beautiful images, but unfortunately you don't
seem to have an artistic sense...  An artistic image would have movement, would
tell a story, have a past and a future...  and all this in a still image... 
When looking at your picture, I see a very nice render of a blue-print!  Try
working on the concept of you future IRTC submissions!

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
I actually like this image.  It looks like a serendipitous structure but
nonetheless, cool!  Perhaps a more oblique camera angle would have made the
strcutural features stand out.
=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
This one is most definitely off topic. Interesting experiment though.  Your
program might be used in more organic or perhaps abstract modelling I guess.
=====
From R.Bartsch@chello.nl:
I don't think there ever was any doubt about the scientific use for 3d =
rendering technics, but this is an 'artistic' contest with an =
assignment.....nice idea, wrong place

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Seems just off-topic to me.  The topic of this round is 'architecture'.


=====
From r@ip68-11-81-210.no.no.cox.net:
I don't get it.


=====
From r@215-241.opf.slu.cz:
Off topic. Sorry.