=====
From jon@vulpecula.us:
The image is too dark to really tell how well it was made. Doesn't make much
sense to me, either.

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
It was the butler... 

Clever concept. Arm doesn't look too healthy.

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:
I must admit I don_t understand the concept of this image. Why would anyone
crushed under a bookcase want to reach for stones? Mysterious!


=====
From pbrasolin@yahoo.it:
Strange image, but surely original. PB

=====
From info@michaelscholz.de:
Strange... hmm... mysterious.

=====
From the_dark_allies@hotmail.com:

It is a bit hard to guess what is going on.  I thought you were depicting a
monster that is responsible for those missing toys a child always goes through.
 From reading your explanation, it seems some one is crushed under a book case,
but the hand_s positioning does not seem to be indicating this well.
=====
From p_chan@shaw.ca:
The hand is modelled fairly well, but the fingers do look 
somewhat short and stubby.

=====
From emediez@emediez.com:
Overwhelming shadows.

=====
From glenn@mccarters.net:
I don't understand a few things about this image.  What are "Stones"?
A good variety of wood textures, but some of them (especially the back =
wall) seem too big for their objects.
The sign on the wall is extremely distracting - it makes no sense being =
here in the scene.
The rolltop desk is nice.


=====
From file:
that sucks