=====
From j.a.bremer@student.tudelft.nl:
A very nice detailed image, but it's a shame of the lighting. Everything looks
very flat since there are no real dark areas in the image
=====
From s.day@uel.ac.uk:
This is a well composed image but it is lacking in realism, I think it =
is a
combination of the textures, lighting and render quality, have you tried
experimenting with radiosity?

=====
From Andreas.Grates@public.uni-hamburg.de:
With a little 'magic' to the textures, this could be THE image. Shame about
that! 

=====
From enrique.sahagun@uam.es:
I like the light you have use and the sky, but perhaps the whole image needs a
bit more complexity.

=====
From greentho@bellsouth.net:
Art: Has a nice primitive sort of feel to it. Colors tend to 
be a bit uniform and perhaps garish. What time is it?
Tech: Good start. Textures simple, lacking detail.
Concept: Straight forward.

=====
From mickro.warf@laposte.net:
colors aren't enjoyed

=====
From file:
This is really beginning to look good. As always, more detail would really make
this image pop. Also, the default ambeint is washing things out a bit. Flood
lights can be so dramatic, at night. 


=====
From file:
I know this place! Lighting on modern plane doesn't match rest of scene.
Otherwise, nicely done!